Calendar

« September 2008
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
    
       
Today

Summary and response to the State of the Union Address

01:17AM Jan 30, 2008 in category Bill Muller by Bill Muller


At
roughly 8:05 pm Central Standard time the words “Madame Speaker the President
of the United States” rang out through the House Chamber for the first time in
the History of the United States of America and President George W. Bush walked
up to the podium to give his final  State
of the Union Address. There was much speculation by TV analysts, columnists and
anyone who decided to flap their gums and spout out their opinion, but all that
was thrown out the window at the beginning of the speech.

President
Bush began talking about the economy right off the bat. He threatened to veto
any bill that Congress would pass that would increase taxes. The Republicans in
the chamber stood and applauded, while the Democrats sat without applause, one
of the many times this split was shown. 
He also said that we must balance the budget and that any bill
containing “earmarks” will be vetoed immediately and sent back to Congress. He
also said that the current stimulus package must be passed quickly and
efficiently and people need to “weather” the current housing foreclosure storm.

The
president proceeded to talk about healthcare and that it needs to be more
affordable and better healthcare. He suggested that the government needs to
stay out of healthcare and give more choice to the people.

He
then talked about the “No Child Left Behind Act”. He said the “bipartisan”
program is working and should remain in place. He urged Congress to renew the
bill when it expires. He also advocated that $300,000,000 in Pell Grants for
students.

He
also asked for Congress to set up more free trade agreements.

President
Bush then began to discuss science and energy. He advocated that our nation
should pursue less dependence on oil and that we should work for international deals
that will lower greenhouse gases and increase emission standards. He also
talked about stem cell research and how they can be made without embryos and
not “destroy life.” When the camera panned towards Vice President Cheney, he
appeared to be asleep.

He
then began to talk about foreign relations. He said that we need to “watch
liberty inspire” other countries that lack democracy. His main point was “we
will deliver justice to our enemies.” He praised the surge in Iraq and stated
it was working. He also asked for a blank check to spend money on the war and
that we cannot allow for an immediate withdrawal of troops. He said Iraqis were
taking control of their future but have a long way to go. He proceeded to
explain that a free Iraq “denies al Queda” a safe haven. He also said that a
failure in Iraq would strengthen Iran. 
He then described how Iran was aiding terrorism and that the Iranian “regime”
hates freedom and that America will protect it’s vital allies and interests. He
said that we have thwarted many terrorist attacks and that Congress must expand
the FISA Bill this week, to “protect our safety.” 

Well,
what is there really to say after an unpopular, lame duck president gives his
final State of the Union Address? For short, I would use the term complete
disaster. Now, in defense of the President, I did agree with what President
Bush had to say about the environment, the genocide in Sudan, and Veterans
Affairs reform, but that’s about it. He gave a pro-war, partisan speech that
did nothing but split the country along party lines once again. He began is
administration claiming to be the “Uniter” but in fact over his presidency has
split the nation in two.  In the final
State of the Union Address the president generally touts what he has done
during his term to better America, Bush did not do this. He said what we needed
to do and it was scary.

If
one looks back to the time before the Iraq war, we were told at the State of
the Union about how evil and cruel Saddam Hussein and his regime were, last
night we got the same story different country. The drums of war towards Iran
are beating and as an eighteen year old male, that is not a good sign, simply
because we do not have the troop numbers. He also described how Iran hates
freedom, supports terrorism, has ballistic missiles, they can create nuclear
weapons and that “America must support its allies and interests.” This sounds
way too familiar to Iraq for me and I am disturbed that he would promote
another war in the Middle East.

President
Bush also outlined a plan for very unpopular legislation he would like passed
and renewed. He asked Congress to renew the No Child Left Behind Act, which is not
helping America because teachers are losing jobs and students are staying in
school longer or dropping out. He also asked for renewal of the FISA bill, that
allows domestic spying and wiretapping without a warrant. This is atrocious
legislation that hopefully will be shot down this week. It is high time
Americans looked at the Constitution and realized this fear mongering, blatant
lying, and other behaviors are unconstitutional.

           

Comments[10]

Comments:

I also "liked" how he sneakishly added vouchers by another name (Pell Grants for kids). Seriously--can't we work to fix the schools that are in trouble rather then ship the students to other schools, which takes money out of the public school system.

Posted by greatbrittany on January 30, 2008 at 01:30 AM CST #

Brittany- obviously 40 years of a Democratic Congress did nothing to HELP the public school system! I think we should be open to ANY ideas right now, because our public schools are absolutely tanking.

Don't blame it on NCLB. This was occurring way before Bush. The blame lies squarely upon your party and its "throw money at a problem" attitude.

I would bet you've not done your research on vouchers- they are a commonsense solution to the bloated bureaucracy that is the public school system.
A bit of anecdotal evidence: My father is a public school teacher. He sent my sister and I to private school because of the sorry state of public schools. He constantly tells me that the system is broken and throwing money at it won't help. I'm inclined to believe him.

Posted by Matt Hittle on January 30, 2008 at 09:37 AM CST #

Nice post Bill.
I fell asleep during the State of the Union. I thought it was boring and uneventful.

Posted by RCDEM on January 30, 2008 at 01:52 PM CST #

I personally loved it. It was just Bush throwing down the gauntlet. At the end, I think I wanted someone to ask him if there was a piece of legislation that he won't veto in the upcoming congressional session.

Posted by Xiao Xi Zhang on January 30, 2008 at 04:47 PM CST #

I also am amazed at our tendency to dumb down issues here. The issue of vouchers vs. public school funding goes beyond "common sense" or "NCLB" or "what Matt Hittle's father wants", it is a complex issue with different dimensions in different socioeconomic environments.

This is one issue which I believe the best thing for the federal government to do is to give more power to the State and municipal governments. Rather than direct federal funding and try to impose largely burdensome federal programs like NCLB, why not just allocate resources depending on student population and then like the municipal administrators adapt it to the demands of their school districts? There will need to be federal regulation standards of course, but this large colossus that we have now is excessive and, quite frankly, ineffective. This is one area where I think the "State first" conservatives had it right.

Posted by Xiao Xi Zhang on January 30, 2008 at 09:05 PM CST #

You are right Matt, our schools have major issues right now. I also agree that simply throwing money at the problem is not going to fix it but neither is taking money away from a school. I have done immense research on education policy because I am going to be a teacher and I will assuredly be teaching in the public school system. I'd go into it more but alas it's 4am and I need some sleep.

Posted by greatbrittany on January 31, 2008 at 04:06 AM CST #

I'm not talking about NCLB- My father is a teacher and I know the difficulties that legislation has brought into being.

I'm talking about VOUCHERS. They have nothing to do with NCLB or religious schools or anything negative that the Democrats would have the American public believe.

If Xiao would've READ my post, he would realize that the money I propose spending would not just go to states or municipal governments- but directly into the pockets of parents, letting them choose the school their children attend. This way, poor parents aren't told by the Almighty Federal Government how to raise their children- they won't be forced by the State to keep their kids in crappy schools. They can use the money that would've bought their mediocre public school education to buy a better one from a private school (or better public school).

See my RECENT POST on the issue.

Posted by Matt Hittle on January 31, 2008 at 05:40 AM CST #

Also- Where's the anger at Teddy Kennedy for co-authoring that NCLB legislation?

I think you guys are suffering from a selective memory!

Posted by Matt Hittle on January 31, 2008 at 05:41 AM CST #

Matt, I did read your post, and like almost everything else I read from you, I found it shortsighted and more driven by ideology than practicality.

I'm not sure if vouchers is practical for anyone but middle America. How many of those poor parents actually have access to the private schools that would greatly benefit from the Vouchers program? Can we actually expected these private schools to handle the additional student population? Why on Earth would the Federal government support private schools at the expense of their public school program?

I think there's no one size fits all education policy, that's why I believe we have to let municpal and state governments adapt to the demands of their specific state. It might very well be vouchers in states like California or Washington, but I don't believe there exists a one size fit all policy, especially given the context of access, prejudice and current conditions.

Posted by Xiao Xi Zhang on January 31, 2008 at 11:13 AM CST #

I love it! I disagree and offer another solution and I'm automatically "shortsighted!" The oft-touted tolerance of the Democratic Party on display!

At any rate, we agree on the fact that the federal government needs to get out of the education business. They've done quite poorly and have had their chance. What I'm trying to say is that states should have the freedom to implement any system they like. The Dept. of Education and teachers' unions have ruined the system. We need to reclaim it.

Second, do you want those inner-city children to just rot in those schools? All I've heard is "well, how will they get to school?" without any substantive ideas for FIXING that problem. Honestly, if transportation is our only worry with regard to vouchers, that's very promising.

I wonder why Dems are so opposed to a system that will, most likely, achieve most- if not all- of the ends we strive towards. Methinks it's because the Democratic Party just can't bring itself to relinquish federal control of education- Xiao excluded, of course.

Posted by Matt Hittle on January 31, 2008 at 02:02 PM CST #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: Allowed